Traits And Dynamics Of Tourism Destinations-Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Traits And Dynamics Of Tourism Destinations? Answer: Introducation I work for Australia Department of Tourism which is a government institution task with the management of tourism in Australia. The Australia Department of Tourism works at the national level as a branch of the government of Australia in charge of tourism. The Australia Department of Tourism is a government agency task with tourism management. The department plays a major role in attracting tourist to Australia. The role the agency is to provide information and current data on tourism and advertise the Australian tourism within the country and globally. The value of the organization or agency is to build resilience and competitiveness Australias tourism industry and increase its economic contribution to the Australian economy (Luce 2003). The organization has both external and internal influence that shapes the operation of the organization. The organization has goals such to achieving more than $115 billion budget in overnight spend and maximum economic contribution of the tour to Au stralia (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2014). My plan seeks to address the effects of the reduction of flora and fauna that are the main tourist attraction in Australia especially in Tasmania East Coast. According to CSIRO, one of the megatrends is what it calls Going, going ... gone? and concerns continuous depletion of the flora and fauna which is the main tourist attraction (Hughes, Daily Ehrlich 2000, Pages 7183). Background context Most of tourists that come to Australia are attracted to unique beautiful flora and fauna found in the Tasmania East Coast region. Tourism is faced by several issues that include the depletion of natural resources that are the tourist attraction and need to be considered deeply. For instance, thylacine an animal that used to live within Tasmania was exterminated in the region in 1936 (Boyce 2006, pp 102-129). Tourism, more so at the national level, requires to reviews flora and faunas depletion rate issue since it points to detrimental level. Only 42% of this region is currently under protection and there is need for more of these resource to be protected especially near East Coast region (Fernando 2014, pp. 34-50). Most of the visitors coming to Australia are attracted due to the natural resources within the Tasmania East Coast (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, 2017). Visitors that visited Australia within the financial year that ended in June 2017 are estimated to be 8.5 million. This number is estimated to be 8.9% increase from the previous year. Per Wattanacharoensil Schuckert (2016), the income that is plowed into the Australian economy is approximate $40.6 billion. The figure also represents 7% increase from the previous year (Dredge Jenkins 2007, p 336). Natural resource conservation is one of the areas within the tourism sector that play an important role with a reasonable number of employees. Generally Australian tourism industry employs around 1 million employees of which 929000 are employed either directly or indirectly in the tourism sector of the Australian economy. The number of employees in tourism sector represents 8% of all employees in Australian labor market. Of this number, 7% are employed in conservation of flora and fauna. More than 2000 employees for instance are employed directly in national parks on permanent basis alone (Australian Bureau of Statistics 2014). Some other huge numbers of employees are indirectly employed in conservation and conservation research related areas. The employees number still deficit with nearly 38000 vacancies remaining unfilled in the tourism sector. Four key issues remain a challenge in the tourism sector in Australia and this is improving employee recruitment to get the best employees, enhancing regional workforce, education gap identification, increasing work mobility (Dianne Tazim 2015, pp. 285-297). There are many drivers for natural resource conservation that cut across economic, socio-cultural, technological, demographic, environmental and political. Socio-cultural drivers of resource conservation and tourism are resources. Demographic drivers focus on the increasing population that poses challenges in the existence of natural resources. Increasing population exact more pressure on the available land hence reduces the land available for natural forest and animal living within. Policies are the main political drivers for natural resource conservation which may reduce depletion of the natural resource. The Australian government has develops policies aiming at the conservation of plant and animals though much need to be done. Environmental drivers that increase depletion of natural plants and animals include climatic changes and natural disasters that reduce plants and animals (Christof 2006, Pages 87-108). Reduction of natural resources is important as it touches the entire economy of Australia though have the equally high impact of natural resources if felt in the tourism sector. Firstly, the depletion is not only a national disaster but also global issue (Airey Chong 2011). The rate at which natural resources are going away is worrying and more effort is needed in order to curb the reduction rate. Secondly, natural resources being a major tourist attraction to the Tasmania East Coast, its reduction become a major problem for the economy since there is much wealth that is tied to natural resources. Loosing tourist attraction means losing visitors and therefore more than $40.8 million that comes from tourism sector is most likely to be affected. Thirdly, reduction of natural resources especially natural plant causes climatic changes that are also dangerous for tourism sector (Beschta 2003, pp 12951309). CSIRO has cited reduction of natural plants and animals as one of its megatrends with the title of Going, going ... gone?(CSIRO, 2017) the rate at which plants and animals are depleted is worrying that point to the development of policies with a clear plan on how to address this megatrend. National parks are some of the major tourist attractions that harvest a huge amount of money from tourist throughout the year. These parks purely bank on flora and fauna as a tourist attraction and therefore reduction of these resources mean the destruction of tourist attraction. There is the need for urgent development of policies and plan to safeguard the depletion of these plants and animals. The flora and fauna form some of the basic features of country's resources with the capability to attract many visitors. Yet per CSIRO, these resources are going away with some areas already gone (Plger 2001, pp 219241). A Statement of Need Plant to protect and safeguard flora and fauna in Tasmania East Coast is needed to help preserve resources for future and continuous anesthetic purpose. Natural resource protection plan is needed to reduce the rate at which plants are going away due to depletion. Though there are parks such as Freycinet under conservation, there are needs to increase more Tasmania wilderness under conservation (Konar Estes 2003, pp 174185). The government plays a critical role in the plan since the government should develop a plan and implement the plan. Firstly, natural plant and animals protection plan need the government funding and this forms the crucial aspect of plan implementation. The major source of funding for the plan is expected to come from the government through Tourism Australia department. Tourism Australia pay reasonable amount of money to ensure that conservation is maintained in all restricted areas (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, 2017). Secondly, political goodwill from the government in adoption and implementation of the plan sets the ground for protection of these tourist attraction resources. It is worth noting that natural resources that include natural plants and animals are under government protection and any plan need approval from the government. The business community also plays an equally important role in the protection of plants and animals since they form part of tourism value chain (Gajdok et al 2017, Vol.24). Major stakeholders in this plan are tourism industries, the government, tourists, community, and scientists. Most of the visitors who are attracted to these flora or fauna resources come from hospitality industries. These industries include hotel industry, transport industries, and tourism marketing industries that are directly or indirectly involved in the utilization of natural resources (Newsome 2001, P.2033). Secondly, the government is another stakeholder that offers funding and all the resources that are needed to protect and conserve natural resources. Moreover, the government helps in implementation of plans that aim at conserving plants and animals including their environments. Thirdly, tourists are attracted by these plants and animals and are therefore also stakeholders that play role in implementation of the plan. Fourthly, the community is another stakeholder with the capability to help the government protect plant and animals resource from destruction. Finally, conserva tionist or scientists form a battery of experts that study and develop ways to conserve natural resource (Honnold et al, 2005, pp 168-176). Key trends that influence depletion of plants and animals are climatic change, human activities that put more pressure, natural disasters and political issues. Firstly, climatic change is the number one threat to flora or fauna as the change in climatic condition is currently characterized by drought. This is dangerous to the life of plants and animals as plants dry up leaving bare grounds with limited animals habitat (Sainaghi Baggio 2017, Vol.63). Secondly, human activities such as industrialization and human encroachment are currently reducing the forest to either residential or industrial area. Thirdly, natural disasters such as bushfires and earthquakes are major devastating causes of plant and animals destruction that need to be factored in the plan. Fourthly, political factors such as government policies have much influence in the reduction of natural plants and animals (Albrecht 2015). The challenges that remain paramount to development and adoption of natural resource protection are finance, political will, lack of corporation form major stakeholders. Firstly, financial resources form the basis of conservation and are needed more so at the implementation. The tourism Australia being a government agency can source financial resources from the government for the implementation of this policy or plan (Sanderson et al, 2007, pp. 810-813). Secondly, in a government agency, one of the challenges is lack of political goodwill for the implementation of the plan. For the agency to respond to this challenge the agency should look for ways to pressure the government to accept the plan. Stakeholders cooperation is another challenge as many stakeholders sometimes dont cooperate with the project management jeopardizing the whole problem. The Tourism department as an agency needs to bring together all the stakeholders on board to understand the necessity and importance of protec ting the environment, plants and animals as the basic tourist attraction resources (Gillian 2011, p. 29). The government of Australia need to be involved in the plan since the agency involved is a government agency. The plan or policy will form part of government policies that aim at reducing natural resource depletion. Government is the main fund source that will help in the implementation of the plan. In addition, the government through the tourism department should raise the conservation policies as core strategy or development business strategy (Yu, Li He 2017). The desirable effects, benefits, and outcomes of the plan have both long-term and short-term effects. Short-term benefits of conserving natural plants and animals are based on the value of natural plants and animals (Shone, Simmons Dalziel 2016). Natural plants and animals are the major tourist attraction that attracts visitors coming to Australia. On the long-term benefits of the conservation include environmental benefits. Trees that form the better part of flora modifies climates are the major water catchment. Natural plants are the source of manure that fertilizes the soil hence maintaining the structure and health. Reducing depletion of natural plants and animals has the effects of improving both the environment and climate. Therefore, the plan seeks to address the continuous depletion of natural plants and animals that is one of the megatrends listed by CSIRO (Howell et al, 2017, pp 662-670). Scope of the proposed plan The two major possible plan approaches are community involvement and massive conservation of flora and fauna especially along Tasmania East Coast. Firstly, the first major approach community involvement in resource conservation that aims at reducing any destruction of plants and animal habitat. Communities are the critical stakeholders in plants conservation and need to be involved at every level including at national level. Secondly, sustainability approach is another strategy that can assist the government to initiate the sustainability in natural resource management and conservation. The sustainability approach makes use of proper utilization these natural resources without depletion. Thirdly, areas restriction approach restricts areas still under natural forests or animal so as to protect these resources from destruction and depletion. Areas that are still under natural resources especially within Bichero and St Helens that have not been conserved or protected need to be the rest riction (Lynn, Scarles, Tribe 2016, pp. 97-110). There are some instruments that need to put in place to ensure that the plan is successful. Some of these instruments that need to be used and these include legislation and manpower. Firstly, the government needs to put in place laws that restrict certain areas for conservation of within East Coast. Various areas that are restricted need to be covered in-laws so that it allows the conservationists enforce the restriction. Secondly, manpower is other instruments that are put in place to spearhead the campaigns for conservation of these plants and animals. There are several human resources that are used in drive the campaign for both community and conservationists (Fernando 2014, pp. 34-50). Several instruments could be used more effectively in driving the conservation plan. Firstly, financial or money resources are used to drive conservation and conservation campaigns. Advocacy is another instrument that plays an important role in conservation to reduce depletion of plants and animals. Government action can be used effectively in enforcing restriction in natural resources. The government actions also are important in the mobilization of resources that are used in conservation. Laws are some other instrument that if it used effectively, laws are used to enforce conservation (Dredge Jenkins 2007, p 336). Advantages of the conservation plan are sustainability, environmental benefits, and monetary values. Firstly, sustainability advantages ensure that while using natural resources there is continuous uses and reduced depletion. Sustainability ensures there is reduced depletion of natural resources to ensure that natural resources remain to continue giving service. Secondly, another advantage of the natural resources is environmental benefits that include climatic modification and soil protection. Thirdly, the plan works to safeguard tourist attraction resource that attracted to Tasmania East Coast. Monetary value is another advantage of conserving the environment. Some natural resources are exploited for monetary value since natural resources are used for various industrial uses (Souleacute, Estes, Berger Martinez 2003, pp 12381250). Disadvantages of the policy include changes of ownership of lands that are under natural resources. Adopting conservation policy will ensure natural resources areas that are under conservation or restricted areas has enforced ownership as the government assumed ownership of those areas. Secondly, being a national level policy, there is several resources that are used in the implementation of the policy. Various instruments are needed to implement the policy and this considers many different resources (Hristov Ramkissoon 2016, Vol.61). The plan or policy can provide the direction that is needed for reducing the loss of natural resources. Firstly, the policy sets the ground for various conservation strategies that were not in place. Though there are various areas that are under conservation and this includes Freycinet National Parks and are used protect plants and animals. The policy sets the ground for more areas that are yet to be identified since CSIRO gives details of different challenges that still remain without restriction. In addition, the policy gives the direction that is needed mobilize resources that are used in the conservation of these areas (Shone, Simmons Dalziel 2016). Proposed process The planning process is a complex stage of the policy development that takes into considerations many this in place. The policy planning process takes three different stages and these are development, implementation, and evaluation process. Firstly, the plan begins with the development of framework putting in place are the necessary resources and instruments. At the development of the plan, various policy aspects are put in place (Airey Chong 2010, pp295-314). Secondly, implementation of the policy considers instruments that are needed such as financial resources, human resource, and laws. For instance, at the implementation stage, laws will be enforced in restricted areas and conservation campaigns will also be launched. Thirdly, the evaluation requires all players and stakeholders to give the necessary feedback on the success or challenges that are encountered in implementing the policy (Schmitz, Post, Burns Johnston 2003, PP 11991205). The policy will be done in three phases that can follow each other in a consecutive manner and these are research, analysis, and consultations. Firstly, the project team conducts research to identify areas that need conservation and the urgency that need to consider while implementing the development plan. Secondly, after analysis of the areas that need to be conserved, data are analyzed with the aim of identification of gaps, resources needed and all the instruments that are needed to implement the policy. Consultation stage considers all the experts and all the stakeholders that will play role in implementation of the policy. This also gives the necessary measures that will be taken into consideration while implementing the plan (Oksanen Oksanen 2000, pp 240261). There are many different stakeholders that will be consulted when implementing the policy. Some of these stakeholders are experts, government offices and the community in general. Firstly, conservation experts and various scientists will give enough information on the applicability of the plan. The strategic expert also will assist in evaluating the feasibility of the plan and the financial implications of implementing the project (Sanderson et al, 2007, pp. 810-813). Secondly, the government officers and offices that are from tourism, conservation, and treasury will be consulted on the implementation and financial resources required. Finally, the community will be involved in the implementation of the plan are part of the policy since some lands that are used by the community will be under restriction to ensure there is more land under protection as compared to the current conserved areas. Moreover, when launching sustainability conservation of the resource, the community will be th e immediate environment to implement the project (Laliberte Ripple 2004, pp 123138). The implementation of the policy takes three different phases and these are an advertisement of areas, launching of policy campaigns, enforcement of policy and evaluating the policy. The government officially advertises restricted areas that will be covered under the new conservation policy and this is meant to make citizens that are living in these areas to move away from these areas. After giving residents of the restricted areas time to evacuate the areas there is actual launch of the conservation campaigns to ensure that community is involved in conservation as part of the strategy. The law enforcement, therefore, commences protecting the areas so as to protect the area against any destruction. Finally, the evaluation process takes into accounts those visitors that come to these places and the size of the area under conservation also will be evaluated (Hristov Ramkissoon 2016, Vol.61). The policy will be reviewed based on the financial resource used, areas under conservation and challenges faced in implementation. Financial resources audit will assist the policy team to review a number of resources used in the policy. The financial records that are used in the implementation of the policy give direct data on the success or failure of the plan. The area under conservation is another way to review the policy as the policy has to meet the maximum set target for implementers. Another way to review the policy includes evaluating the challenges that affected the implantation and this will include hostility encountered while enforcing the policy in restricted areas. Lastly, the number of visitors that come to the area to view the conserved plants and animals is another way to review the whole system (Dela Saporsantos 2016). The success of the policy is determined by the output realized from the project and input resources used in the policy development and implantation (Edgell 2008). The positive feedback from both conserved area and tourism industry are some of the ways to determine the success of the policy. In addition, the number of visitors coming to the areas and the amount of land that is under restriction gives the success of the policy. Finally, the comparison between the resources used in development and implementation of the policy including maintaining the area compared alongside the amount of money received from visitors determines the success of the policy (Souleacute, Estes, Berger Martinez 2003, pp 12381250). Conclusion In conclusion, Tourism Australia gives six megatrends that are related tourism in Australia and globally. These megatrends affect the tourism at the national level that needs policy development to address this megatrend. Going, going ... gone? Is a major trend that is concerned with continuous depletion of natural plants and animals. There is the need for policy or plan that will increase the number of areas under conservation to protect most natural plants and animals. As per statistics there is need to increase natural resources within Tasmania East Coast under conservation since these are a tourist attraction. References Airey, D, Chong, K, 2011, Tourism in China: Policy and Development since 1949, Oxford: Routledge. Airey, D, Chong, K, 2010, National Policy-Makers for Tourism in China Annals of Tourism Research, vol. 37, no.2, pp295-314. Albrecht, JN, 2015,Challenges in National-level Tourism Strategy Implementation A Long-term Perspective on the New Zealand Tourism Strategy Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2014, Tourism Satellite Account 2014-15KeyFigures. www.gov.au/australianbureauofstatistics/ Beschta, RL, 2003, Cottonwoods, elk, and wolves in the Lamar Valley of Yellowstone National Park. Ecological Applications 13: pp 12951309. Boyce, J, 2006, The Social Impact of the Introduction of Dogs to Tasmania in Environmental psychology, vol.11, no.1, pp 102-129 Christof, P, January 2006, Tourism Policy in the Making: An Australian Network Study. Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 33, no. 1, Pages 87-108 CSIRO, 2017, Six Megatrends identified by CSIRO. Accessible at: https://www.csiro.au/en/Do-business/Futures/Reports/Our-Future-World Dela, SE, Saporsantos, J. 2016, Philippine Tourism Act of 2009: tourism policy formulation analysis from Multiple Streams. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure, and Events Dianne D, Tazim J, 2015, Progress in tourism planning and policy: A post-structural perspective on knowledge production. Tourism Management, Volume 51, pp. 285-297 Dredge, D Jenkins, JM 2007, Tourism planning and policy, John Wiley Sons, Milton, BUS_TOURISM_PUBS 336 Edgell, DL, 2008, Tourism Policy and Planning: yesterday, today and tomorrow, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. Fernando, AG, 2014, A comparative study of the evolution of tourism policy in Spain and Portugal Tourism Management Perspectives, Volume 11, pp. 34-50 Gajdok T., et al 2017, Destination structure revisited in view of the community and corporate model. Tourism Management Perspectives, Volume 24, Gillian, P, 2011, American Conservatism in Historical Perspective, in Crisis of Conservatism? The Republican Party, the Conservative Movement, American Politics After Bush, Gillian Peele, J, Aberbach D, (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 29 Honnold, DL, et al, 2005, Strongly Interacting Species: Conservation Policy, Management, and Ethics. American Institute of Biological Sciences, vol. 55, no.2, pp 168-176 Howell, CD, et al, 2017, Effects of land cover on coyote abundance. Wildlife Research vol.43 no.8, pp 662-670. Hristov, D, Ramkissoon H, 2016, Leadership in destination management organizations. Annals of Tourism Research, Volume 61, Hughes, JB, Daily, GC, Ehrlich PR, 2000, The loss of population diversity and why it matters. Pages 7183 in Raven PH, ed. Nature and Human Society: The Quest for a Sustainable World. Washington (DC): National Academy Press. Konar, B, Estes, JA, 2003, The stability of boundary regions between kelp beds and deforested areas. Ecology 84: pp 174185. Crossref Laliberte, AS, Ripple WJ, 2004, Range contractions of North American carnivores and ungulates. BioScience 54: pp 123138. Luce, B, 2003, A Multi-state Conservation Plan for the Black-tailed Prairie Dog, Cynomys ludovicianus, in the United States. Sierra Vista (AZ): Wildlife Management Institute. Lynn, B, Scarles, C, Tribe, J, 2016, Mess and method: Using ANT in tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, Volume 60, pp. 97-110 Newsome, AE, 2001, The biology and ecology of the dingo. Pages 2033 in Dickman CR, Lunney D, eds. A Symposium on the Dingo. Mosman (Australia): Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales. Oksanen, L, Oksanen, T, 2000, The logic and realism of the hypothesis of exploitation ecosystems. American Naturalist 118: PP 240261. Crossref Plger, J, 2001, Public Participation and the Art of Governance. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. Vol.28, no.2, pp 219241. Sainaghi R, Baggio R, 2017, Complexity traits and dynamics of tourism destinations. Tourism Management, Volume 63, Sanderson, I J, et al, 2007, International Conservation Policy Delivers Benefits for Birds in Europe. Vol. 317, Issue 5839, pp. 810-813 Schmitz, OJ, Post, E, Burns, CE, Johnston KM, 2003, Ecosystem responses to global climate change: Moving beyond color mapping. BioScience 53: PP 11991205. BioOne Shone, MC, Simmons, DG, Dalziel, P, 2016, Evolving roles for local government in tourism development: a political economy perspective. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. Souleacute, ME, J. Estes, J, Berger, Martinez CDR, 2003, Ecological effectiveness: Conservation goals for interactive species. Conservation Biology 17: pp 12381250. Crossref Wattanacharoensil, W, Schuckert, M, 2016, Reviewing Thailands master plans and policies: implications for creative tourism? Current Issues in Tourism 1 Yu, M, Li, Z, He, L, 2017, Composition and optimization of environmental protection policies in the tourism industry in China: based on metrical studies of the co-word network. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research